πŸ›οΈ Executive Steering Committee

What happens when you click

πŸ›‘οΈ

CISO

β€œShow me the firewall rules in the cloud before you show me anything else.”
🧭

CIO

β€œEighteen months. Are we on track? Show me the burn-down.”
πŸ’Ό

CFO

β€œI approved a budget, not a blank cheque. Where are we on spend vs progress?”
Decisions appear here.

Approval gates & escalation

Architectpresents
➜
CISO gatesecurity parity
➜
PM burn-downschedule
➜
CFO controlsspend
➜
Decisiongo / conditional / blocked
Click a node to learn what it does.

    Deep dive

    How

    • Translate each firewall zone pair (DMZβ†’App, Appβ†’DB) into subnet + NSG/Security Group rules; export rules from Panorama, import as Terraform.
    • Put a WAF (AWS WAF / Azure Front Door WAF) in front of anything public.
    • Track burn-down weekly; report monthly to SteerCo.

    Why

    • Executives need decisions framed in their language: risk, time, money.
    • A SteerCo that only hears good news cannot help you.

    When

    • Monthly, plus an extraordinary SteerCo before each major wave.

    Pitfalls

    • Presenting a β€œgreen” status with a red reality.
    • Letting the CISO see the design for the first time at T-0.
    • No named risk owner when risk is accepted.

    Key ideas

    Risk acceptance is legitimate β€” if it is explicit

    An executive may accept residual risk, but it must be written, time-bound and owned. The playground logs it as CONDITIONAL GO rather than GO.

    Escalation path

    Workstream lead β†’ PMO β†’ SteerCo β†’ Executive Board. Skipping levels burns credibility; never escalating burns schedule.

    NSGWAFBurn-downRisk registerCAB

    🐍 Python executed on the server (steerco)
    loading…